Application Note

HTRF cAMP dynamic 2 and IP-One assays on the SpectraMax M5e reader

  • Flexibility of a dual monochromator-based system
  • Wide dynamic ranges and excellent Z’ factors
  • Preconfigured HTRF protocols with SoftMax Pro Software

Download PDF    

Introduction

The SpectraMax® M5e Multi-Mode Microplate Reader is a dualmonochromator capable of fluorescence, time-resolved fluorescence (TRF), fluorescence polarization, absorbance, and luminescence assays. It offers the additional advantage of HTRF® (homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence) certification, allowing life sciences and drug discovery researchers to increase their productivity through greater flexibility in TRF detection.

HTRF is a versatile technology developed by Cisbio for detecting molecular interactions between biomolecules.1 Combining the features of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and TRF, it uses Europium (Eu) cryptate as its donor fluorophore and a modified allophycocyanin (XL665) or the small molecule d2 as the acceptor fluorophore. When interacting biomolecules are labeled with Europium cryptate and d2, FRET takes place between the donor and the acceptor fluorophores, resulting in fluorescence emission monitored at 665 nm, while most of the excitation energy of the cryptate is released as fluorescence emission at 620 nm. Well-to-well variability is corrected by using Cisbio’s patented HTRF ratio calculation, which utilizes the ratio of the 665 nm and 620 nm fluorescent signals.

HTRF assay performance on the SpectraMax M5e reader is demonstrated here with two different HTRF assay kits, cAMP dynamic 2 and IP-One. G-protein coupled receptors signal through two major pathways, regulation of cAMP and increase in intracellular calcium levels mediated by IP3. With the cAMP dynamic 2 kit, cAMP levels are detected using a Eu cryptate-labeled monoclonal anti-cAMP antibody and d2-labeled cAMP. Native cAMP produced by cells competes with cAMP-d2 for binding to anti-cAMP antibody-cryptate. An increase in cellular cAMP leads to a decrease in FRET that is detectable as a decrease in the fluorescence at 665 nm. The IP-One assay has a similar format and uses a monoclonal antibody specific to IP1, a more stable downstream metabolite of IP3 that accumulates in signaling cells in the presence of lithium chloride. Fluorescence at 665 nm is inversely proportional to the concentration of IP1 in the calibrator or cell lysate. This application note presents both cell-based assay data and standard curves generated with the cAMP dynamic 2 and IP-One kits. These HTRF data demonstrate the excellent dynamic range and Z’ factors2 obtainable with the SpectraMax M5e reader.

Materials

  • cAMP dynamic 2 kit, 1000 tests (Cisbio cat. #62AM4PEB)
  • IP-One kit, 1000 tests (Cisbio cat. #62IP1PEB)
  • Cell line: CHO-M1 (M1WT3; ATCC cat. #CRL-1985)
  • Forskolin (Sigma cat. #F3917)
  • 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX; Sigma cat. #I7018)
  • Carbamoylcholine chloride (carbachol; Sigma cat. #C4382)
  • White 384-well microplates (Corning cat. #3705)
  • SpectraMax M5e Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices)

Note: Always use white microplates when performing HTRF assays on the SpectraMax M5e reader. To optimize signal detection, use solid white microplates rather than clear-bottom ones.

Methods

cAMP dynamic 2 assay

CHO-M1 cells were grown in Ham’s F12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin/L-glutamine, and 200 µg/mL G418. The cAMP dynamic 2 assay was performed on cells in suspension. Cells were trypsinized the day of the assay, resuspended in Ham’s F12 medium without additives, and seeded at 4,000 cells per well in a volume of 10 µL per well in a white 384-well microplate. To stimulate cAMP production, cells were treated with 10 µL of forskolin at final concentrations of 3 nM to 1 mM for one hour prior to addition of detection reagents. IBMX was added to assay wells at 0.5 mM to inhibit phosphodiesterasemediated cAMP degradation.

After one hour of forskolin treatment, cAMP-d2 in conjugate and lysis buffer, and anti-cAMP antibody-cryptate, were added to the cells as described in the product insert. A cell negative control containing untreated cells received anticAMP antibody-cryptate and conjugate and lysis buffer without cAMP-d2. This FRET-negative control was necessary for calculating Delta F values as outlined in the HTRF package insert3 . The final assay volume for all samples and standards was 40 µL, but assay volume can be adjusted for different microplate types.

Standards for cAMP were prepared as indicated in the cAMP dynamic 2 HTRF package insert. Final concentrations of cAMP ranged from 0.17 to 712 nM, and a positive control without cAMP (maximum FRET) was included. A cAMP control consisting of free cAMP was used to monitor assay activity, and a negative (no-FRET) control without cAMP or cAMP-d2 was used to calculate Delta F. cAMP-d2 was added to all standards and to the positive control, while the negative control received conjugate and lysis buffer without cAMP-d2. Anti-cAMP antibodycryptate was added to all standards and controls. After a one-hour incubation at room temperature, the microplate was read on the SpectraMax M5e reader. (See Table 1 for instrument settings.)

IP-One assay

CHO-M1 cells were cultured as described above. Cells were seeded into 384-well microplates at 10,000–40,000 cells per well in complete growth medium the day before the assay. The next day, cells were stimulated with carbachol concentrations ranging from 15 nM to 33 µM (stimulation buffer containing lithium chloride was used to prepare carbachol concentrations). After a one-hour stimulation, IP1-d2 in conjugate and lysis buffer, and anti-IP1 antibodycryptate, were added to the wells. A cell negative control containing untreated cells received anti-IP1 antibody-cryptate and conjugate and lysis buffer without IP1-d2. The final assay volume was 40 µL, but as with the cAMP assay, this volume can be adjusted for different microplate types.

IP1 standards with final concentrations ranging from 21.5 to 22,000 nM were prepared by diluting reconstituted IP1 standard in stimulation buffer as indicated in the IP-One HTRF package insert.4 A positive IP1 and a negative control without IP1 were included. IP1-d2 was added to all standards and to the positive IP1 control, while the negative control received conjugate and lysis buffer without IP1-d2. Anti-IP1 antibody-cryptate was added to all samples. After incubating for one hour at room temperature, the microplate was read on the SpectraMax M5e reader with the settings indicated in     Table 1.

Read type Endpoint
Read mode Time Resolved
Delay: 50
Integration: 400
Top Read
Wavelengths
Ex Em Cutoff
314 620 570
314 668 630
Sensitivity Readings: 100
PMT: Auto
Autocalibrate On
Settling time Off
Carriage speed Normal

Table 1. Instrument settings for SpectraMax M5e reader

Data analysis

Data from both cAMP and IP-One assays were analyzed according to Cisbio’s guidelines, using SoftMax® Pro Software. Four different ready-to-use HTRF protocols in SoftMax Pro Software have been designed to simplify data acquisition and analysis for all types of HTRF assays currently available.

FRET was calculated as follows:

Ratio = (Signal665 nm/Signal620 nm) x 10000

Delta Ratio = Standard or Sample Ratio - Rationeg

(where Rationeg is the ratio for the negative control)

Delta F% = (Delta R/Rationeg) x 100

Instrument settings

Wavelength, delay and integration settings have been optimized for the dual monochromator-based SpectraMax M5e reader. Most notably, the best emission wavelength for XL665/d2 donor was determined to be 668 nm rather than 665 nm as indicated in HTRF product information.

Results

Best results were obtained from cAMP cell-based assays using about 4,000 CHOM1 cells per well in a 384-well microplate (40 µL final assay volume). Optimal cell density may vary according to cell type and specific assay conditions. A one-hour treatment of the cells with forskolin yielded a dose-response curve with an EC50 of 11.4 µM and Z’ factor of 0.86 (Figure 1). Delta F% values calculated using Cisbio’s ratiometric formulas ranged from 47 to 707 (Table 2), similar to the range observed for the cAMP standard curve (Figure 2, Table 3).

Figure 1. cAMP cell-based assay. Forskolin dose-response in CHO-M1 cells (Z’ = 0.86, EC50 = 11.4 µM).

Forskolin (µM) Average Ratio SD Ratio CV % Ratio Average Delta F%
1000.000 762 30.7 4.0 47
200.000 951 29.2 3.1 83
40.000 1633 84.3 5.2 215
8.000 2623 137.7 5.3 406
1.600 3508 134.5 3.8 576
0.320 3854 303.3 7.9 643
0.064 4008 106.7 2.7 673
0.013 4186 154.0 3.7 707
0.003 4185 133.6 3.2 707
0 4459 204.3 4.6 760

Table 2. Summary of cAMP cell-based assay data

Figure 2. cAMP standard curve. cAMP standard curve (Z’ = 0.84, EC50 = 6.3 nM, comparable to the value indicated in the package insert).

cAMP (nM) Average Ratio SD Ratio CV % Ratio Average Delta F%
712.0 515.2 22.8 4.4 5.4
178.0 674.9 12.6 1.9 38
44.5 1089.9 59.8 5.5 122.9
11.1 2088.7 149.5 7.2 327.2
2.8 3166.8 83.6 2.6 547.7
0.7 3910.1 190.9 4.9 699.7
0.2 4341 98.6 2.3 787.8
0 4610.1 227.9 4.9 842.9

Table 3. Summary of cAMP dynamic 2 assay standard curve data.

In IP-One cell-based assays, optimal cell density was determined as 10,000 CHOM1 cells per well of a 384-well microplate (40 µL final assay volume). A one-hour stimulation with carbachol yielded a doseresponse curve with an EC50 of 0.64 µM and Z’ factor of 0.91 (Figure 3). Delta F% values calculated using Cisbio’s ratiometric formulas ranged from 3402 to 12539. (Table 4).

Figure 3. IP1 cell-based assay. Carbachol dose-response curve in CHO-M1 cells (Z’ = 0.91, EC50 = 0.64 µM carbachol).

Carbachol (µM) Average Ratio SD Ratio CV % Ratio Average Delta F%
100.00 3402 141.5 4.2 463
33.33 3538 68.8 1.9 486
11.11 3646 42.7 1.2 503
3.7 4105 25.5 0.6 579
1.23 5720 120.3 2.1 847
0.41 9517 143.6 1.5 1476
0.14 11733 397.9 3.4 1843
0.05 12234 424.1 3.5 1926
0.02 12357 139.2 1.1 1946
0 12539 102.1 0.8 1976

Table 4. Summary of IP-One cell-based assay data.

Preparation of IP1 standards as directed in the IP-One HTRF package insert produced a calibration curve with a Z’ factor of 0.84 (Figure 4) and Delta F% values ranging from 820 to 11883 (Table 5).

Figure 4. IP1 standard curve. Z’ = 0.84, EC50 = 501 nM, comparable to the value indicated in the package insert.

IP1 (µM) Average Ratio SD Ratio CV % Ratio Average Delta F%
30800 820 28.6 3.5 44
7700 1389 71.0 5.1 144
1925 3011 127.7 4.2 429
481 6348 238.7 3.8 1015
120 9668 334.6 3.5 1598
30 11157 551.1 4.9 1860
0 11883 566.3 4.8 1987

Table 5. Summary of IP-one standard curve data.

Conclusion

The SpectraMax M5e Multi-Mode Microplate Reader with HTRF certification expands the range of assay methods available to researchers who want the flexibility of a dual monochromator-based system and the versatility of multiple detection modes. IP-One and cAMP HTRF assays, when run on the SpectraMax M5e reader, exhibit wide dynamic ranges and excellent Z’ factors ranging from 0.78 to 0.91. Data analysis is simplified using SoftMax Pro Software with preconfigured HTRF protocols.

References

  1. TR-FRET Basics (HTRF Technology)
  2. Zhang, J. H., Chung, T. D. Y., and Oldenburg, K. R. (1999). A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol Scrn 4(2): 67-73.
  3. cAMP dynamic 2 HTRF kit package insert (Cisbio international, France).
  4. IP-One HTRF kit package insert (Cisbio international, France).

Learn more about SpectraMax M Series Multi-Mode Microplate Readers >>

Download PDF